On the topic of pop music driving anti-intellectualism..

As I’m trying to establish myself here in San Diego, I’ve found that I’m gravitating towards music again. I’m just a few blocks from a great concert venue that a lot of locals and larger names play, and I think that finding myself in that fray reminds me how much accumulated knowledge, and maybe even skill I have in the area.

While I’ve been thinking more deeply philosophically about music, expression and identity, I bumped into a couple of interesting articles. The first, The Assault on Intellect: How Popular Music’s Lyrics Perpetuate American Idiocy cites work by Andrew Powell-Morris on the topic of “Lyrical Intelligence” wherein the author uses some rubric to determine the reading level of lyrics on the billboard charts over the past 10 years and graphs it all out. The takeaway is that lyrically, pop music is getting dumber.

I don’t necessarily agree with the metric – I think I’d like to somehow measure the depth of the themes of the songs as well as the instrumental maturity.. but nevertheless, it’s a pretty interesting idea, and one that has crossed my mind in the past. Notably, I remember a paraphrase from a friend back in Lafayette on the topic of local bands – “I don’t like local bands; They all try to make their music difficult”. The last half of that certainly has some salience to me. I remember playing in one of my longer running bands, Summerfield, and trying so hard to create something original and challenging. I’ve come to understand this as something of an appeal to ego, but doesn’t make me value it any less. I think the flip side is a band that can go play a three chord song that people enjoy dancing to. Both are valid in their own ways.. Why I’m attracted more to the former, I don’t know. Leaving a lasting mark? Advancing an artform? Self fulfillment from conquering a challenge?

Back to the literature review though.. I saw another article around the same time that referenced a GZA interview on the topic of the absence of lyricism in modern hip-hop. I’ve heard a little of this material before in other interviews with the rapper, but this was a broader collection of ideas. GZA’s criteria of quality aren’t that well organized, but I’ll attempt to capture them in bullet point format here:

  • lyrical
  • Strong
  • Fresh
  • New
  • discussing the art of MCing
  • good analogies
  • good wordplay
  • good sentence structure
  • good visuals
  • not about negative things (?)
  • having a message
  • telling a great story
  • grabbing you / pulling you in
  • understanding life
  • witty
  • intellectual
  • smart rhymes
  • clever rhymes

I see three main themes in these items.. The first is embracing a kind of “meta” culture – describing your rapping skills, and maybe even bragging about them. This is definitely a prominent element in most music styles, but I’m not sure if is really a strong thread in what makes lyrics “good”, at least not for me, from a critical viewpoint.

Storytelling is another theme mentioned by GZA. This one definitely resonates with me and I’ve often cited a good story as the main driver for my preference of hip hop songs. In an era of popular artists bragging about material possessions and success at dubious endeavors, hearing a good story can make a difference.

The last, and largest theme in GZA’s list of preferred qualities seems to be a general intellectual depth and thoughtfulness. Both in terms of being a person with a broad knowledge to draw from but also displaying an aptitude for abstract thinking. This, I think, most relates to the example I cited above about local bands. GZA’s motivations to be creative, innovative and intellectual may be ego driven, but they do also push the envelope of what other artists are doing.

Looping back to the Lyrical intelligence rating, I suspect the criteria used there would probably call GZA’s works less intelligent since the main metric is application of grammar rules – something that is less important to the artist than the wit and craftiness he imbues.

So what?

I guess I wrote this all out to start a conversation with myself about how to make smarter music. I’m going to forego the question of whether challenging music is better or worse than simple music. What is “good” to me? and how would one integrate the conversational tradition of most music lyrics with something more heady?

3 thoughts on “On the topic of pop music driving anti-intellectualism..

  1. Everytime I write these things, I think of several other related points a day or two later. Usually the post is just the tip of the iceberg that is a big mesh of vaguely interconnected thought. I should probably start adding the later thoughts in the comments.. so here is the first.

    “Smart” lyrics – I was remembering a moment ago a time when I was hanging out at my friend John’s recording studio off of 18th street in Lafayette. While a band (I can’t remember who) was taking a break, we were outside talking with them and their entourage. I had apparently been cooking up an idea for a band that did songs educating people on Information technology issues. (bear in mind, this was probably ’97 or ’98) I can’t remember how I came to the conclusion that this was a good idea, but we we’re debating the merits of it. John asked one of the girls who came with the band “would you listen to a band that taught you things about computers?” Her response was “yeah, you could, like, spell things and stuff. I recount this not only because it’s mildly amusing, but perhaps it also illustrates the fuzziness of the topic. Is educating more than spelling things? Is intellectual music more than challenging?

    Second, I also started thinking about my sole hip hop venture. (at least the only one I remember..) In the same time frame as above, I performed a short piece with an early incarnation of the band NoStar at a basement party over off of Vine street in West Lafayette. (At the time, this was the party capital of Purdue University. As John once said, if you went to the corner of Sylvia and Vine on any given weekend and yelled “YoWhereThePartyAt!?” you would get responses from at least three different houses, all raging. This ended in the early 2000’s as police became more strict on both underage consumption and noise ordinances – perhaps thankfully for my now friends who own homes in that area.)

    My rhymes, while immature, might have qualified under GZA’s suppositions about good lyricism. They mostly revolved around boasting of my skill as an emcee, as well as the skill of the band. There was also a bit of a narrative on what the band was doing during the performance. eh.. I guess I’m not getting to a point here.. just basking in weird memories. ha.

  2. Songwriting process – life in the so called space age

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s